<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Week 1: Getting Things&#160;Started</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.360winnett.com/2008/03/19/week-1-getting-things-started/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.360winnett.com/2008/03/19/week-1-getting-things-started/</link>
	<description>Modern Residential Architecture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 22:12:20 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Bell</title>
		<link>http://www.360winnett.com/2008/03/19/week-1-getting-things-started/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 16:07:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360winnett.com/?p=6#comment-3</guid>
		<description>We are indeed planning to share the budget when we&#039;re complete, but I&#039;m not sure we&#039;ll do a green vs regular comparison for each line item (that would be incredibly time consuming).

I can say that &quot;building green&quot; definitely costs more, but you&#039;re also getting a far superior structure, regardless of the eco benefits. You can call it &quot;green construction&quot;... but you might as well just call it &quot;smarter construction&quot;.

I&#039;ve also got the budget from our initial drawings, which will at least give you a decent idea of the cost differences, although it&#039;s not exactly an apples to apples comparison.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We are indeed planning to share the budget when we&#8217;re complete, but I&#8217;m not sure we&#8217;ll do a green vs regular comparison for each line item (that would be incredibly time consuming).</p>
<p>I can say that &#8220;building green&#8221; definitely costs more, but you&#8217;re also getting a far superior structure, regardless of the eco benefits. You can call it &#8220;green construction&#8221;... but you might as well just call it &#8220;smarter construction&#8221;.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve also got the budget from our initial drawings, which will at least give you a decent idea of the cost differences, although it&#8217;s not exactly an apples to apples comparison.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.360winnett.com/2008/03/19/week-1-getting-things-started/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 18:22:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360winnett.com/?p=6#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Great site and good luck with the project
Are you going to post costs and compare Reg construction costs
vs going green to see the diff , pay back period &amp; long term
benefits.
Thx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great site and good luck with the project<br />
Are you going to post costs and compare Reg construction costs<br />
vs going green to see the diff , pay back period &#038; long term<br />
benefits.<br />
Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart</title>
		<link>http://www.360winnett.com/2008/03/19/week-1-getting-things-started/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 20:36:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.360winnett.com/?p=6#comment-2</guid>
		<description>go boy go!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>go boy go!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
